No more than six lines of text within a vertical space of one inch. Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED), 8. Such actions include, but are not limited to: NSF will require senior personnel on potential awards to submit updated Current and Pending Support information prior to award, as well as part of the annual and final reporting process, when applicable. The requisite information is described in the NSF Prospective New Awardee Guide. [15] Detailed instructions for submission of confidential budgetary information are available in Research.gov. The near-field dynamics of a rectangular heated overexpanded jet of aspect ratio two is examined with an implicit large-eddy simulation using experimental data for validation purposes. Proposers should not submit the policy or code-of-conduct to NSF for review. Grant Managers will assist PIs and Key Personnel in organizing, formatting, and completing their submission. It must include clear statements as to why this project is appropriate for planning proposal, including how the funds will be used to formulate a sound approach for future submission to an NSF program. Concept Outlines can be submitted either by email to a cognizant Program Officer or via ProSPCT. If external review is to be obtained, then the PI will be informed in the interest of maintaining the transparency of the review and recommendation process. International Activities Country Name(s) each proposal that describes an international activity, proposers should list the primary countries involved. (ii) The IHE-industry interaction should be described in the Project Description; (iii) A GOALI-Industrial PI Confirmation Letter from the industrial partner that confirms the participation of a co-PI from industry must be submitted with the proposal (if applicable, the letter also must state the degree of industrial participation as well as detail any support that the industry is providing to the institution of higher education). See Chapter I.D.1 for additional information on Concept Outlines. Information on other support assists awarding agency staff in the identification and resolution of potential overlap of support. The AOR is required to complete a certification that the institution has a plan to provide appropriate training and oversight in the responsible and ethical conduct of research to undergraduate students, graduate students, postdoctoral researchers, faculty, and other senior personnel who will be supported by NSF to conduct research and that such training addresses mentortraining and mentorship. This Special Information and Supplementary Documentation section also is not considered an appendix. If the Funding of an International Branch Campus of a U.S. IHE, including through use of a subaward or consultant agreement box or Funding of a Foreign Organization, including through use of a subaward or consultant agreement box is checked on the Cover Sheet, the proposer also must enter the name of the applicable country(ies) in the International Activities Country Name(s) box(es) on the Cover Sheet. The checklist is not intended to be an all-inclusive repetition of the required proposal contents and associated proposal preparation guidelines. A collaborative proposal from one organization (see Chapter II.E.3.a); A collaborative proposal from multiple organizations (see Chapter II.E.3.b); or, Times New Roman at a font size of 11 points or larger; or. %%EOF Additional information on the charging of indirect costs to an NSF award is available in Chapter X.D. In these cases, NSF is especially interested in activities that would catalyze new collaborations that broaden the participation of individuals or organizations underrepresented in NSF award portfolios. All such IP agreements must be consistent with federal law and terms and conditions of the award. endstream endobj 140 0 obj <. (v) Certification Regarding Organizational Support: The AOR is required to complete a certification that there is organizational support for the proposal as required by Section 526 of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010. Include all postdoctoral and fellowship training, as applicable, listing each separately. for additional information. This includes items such as: home address; home telephone, fax, or cell phone numbers; home e-mail address; drivers license number; marital status; personal hobbies; and the like. Email documentation from at least one NSF Program Officer confirming approval to submit a RAPID proposal must be uploaded by the PI as a document entitled RAPID Program Officer Concurrence Email in the Supplementary Documentation section of Research.gov. [11] See PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.i for additional information on submission of special information and supplementary documentation. See Chapter IV.D.2.b. Government-wide certifications and representations are provided by the proposer on an annual basis in SAM (see PAPPG Chapter I.G.2). Funds may be requested for field work, attendance at meetings and conferences, and other travel associated with the proposed work, including subsistence. (iii)only temporary during the travel period. Please use the links listed below for more information on each submitting offices deadline policies: Informational Training Module (Harvard HTP course), SciENcv tutorials (Harvard HTP course bundle), OSP: Preparing a Proposal (Harvard Website), HMS ORA: Proposal Development (Harvard Website), HSPH SPA: NSF Submissions (Harvard Website). NSF may consider the following factors, where relevant and consistent with applicable laws and regulations, in determining the appropriate consequences for violations of disclosure requirements: Prior to submission, it is strongly recommended that proposers conduct an administrative review to ensure that proposals comply with the guidelines established in Part I of the PAPPG or the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide. Any relevant academic and professional achievements and honors. The role of the selection panel is to provide advice on the selection of participants. (See PAPPG Chapter VI.B.1.). PIs are advised that they must submit a Concept Outline prior to submission of a EAGER proposal. Specification of a desired start date for the project is important and helpful to NSF staff; however, requests for specific start dates may not be met. The purpose of NSFs implementation of the Policy is to clarify proposer expectations about NSF-funded research with certain high-consequence pathogens and toxins with potential to be considered DURC or involve enhanced potential pandemic pathogens (PPPs). Note this proposal preparation instruction deviates from the standard proposal preparation instructions contained in this Guide; RAPID proposals must otherwise be compliant with the proposal preparation requirements specified in Part I of the PAPPG. of the NSF budget. Such letters should be provided in the supplementary documentation section of Research.gov and follow the format instructions specified in Chapter II.D.2.i. Construction of the largest projects, major facilities, is typically supported through the Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC) account. Funding of an International Branch Campus of a U.S. IHE (See Chapter I.E.1) If this box is checked, the proposer also must enter the name of the applicable country(ies) in the International Activities Country Name(s) box described below. (ii) Certification Regarding Conflict of Interest: The AOR is required to complete certifications stating that the organization has implemented and is enforcing a written policy on conflicts of interest (COI), consistent with the provisions of Chapter IX.A: that, to the best of the AORs knowledge, all financial disclosures required by the conflict of interest policy were made; and that conflicts of interest, if any, were, or prior to the organizations expenditure of any funds under the award, will be, satisfactorily managed, reduced or eliminated in accordance with the organizations conflict of interest policy. Such proposals would be designated as an Ideas Lab renewal.. At least one industrial participant must be included in the GOALI activity and must be specified in the GOALI-Industrial PI Confirmation Letter. Failure to submit the required sections will result in the proposal not being accepted[9], or being returned without review. The PI may conduct preliminary or conceptual work that does not involve human subjects while the protocol is being developed or is under review, consistent with organizational guidelines. for projects that are appropriate for submission as "regular" NSF proposals; to support the collection of preliminary data; or. Program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. In the Type of Relationship column please specify the personal, family, or business relationship involved. NSF is responsible neither for the agreement reached nor the IP information exchanged between the institution of higher education and the industrial partner. NSF depends on the research communities to provide the justification as well as the capabilities to manage the development and implementation of research infrastructure projects. The sections described below represent the body of a research proposal submitted to NSF. NSF uses the legal business name and physical address from the organizations SAM registration. (f) if the proposal is for renewed support, a description of the relation of the completed work to the proposed work. Expendable materials and supplies necessary for the meeting. No proposer-supplied information may appear in the margins. Submitting finalized Biosketch and Current and Pending Support to NSF. This does not include institutional resources, such as core facilities or shared equipment, that are made broadly available. Such documentation may be required in final reports and is subject to audit. [17] In training activities that involve off-site field work, costs of transportation of participants are allowable. Salaries of professional personnel, editorial, clerical, and other staff members in proportion to the time or effort devoted to the preparation and conduct of the conference and summarizing its results. are unallowable and may not be requested. Where applicable, the box for Historic Places must be checked on the Cover Sheet. Foreign recipients that have a U.S. If the State/Province is not applicable, enter N/A. Prospective PIs are advised that they must submit a Concept Outline prior to submission of a RAISE proposal. PIs are advised that they must submit a Concept Outline prior to submission of a planning proposal. For research infrastructure projects, the project/performance site should correspond to the physical location of the asset. The substitute negotiator must be from the same organization as the PI or co-PI for whom the negotiator is required. The eight categories of research that qualify for exemption from coverage by the regulations are defined in the Common Rule for Protection of Human Subjects. Proposers are advised that the Data Management Plan must not be used to circumvent the 15-page Project Description limitation. The recommendations of the Ideas Lab panel are advisory to NSF. The cost of computer services, including computer-based retrieval of scientific, technical, and educational information, may be requested only where it is institutional policy to charge such costs as direct charges. List of Suggested Reviewers or Reviewers Not to Include (optional), c. Proprietary or Privileged Information (if applicable), d. Proposal Certifications Provided by the Organization, Government-wide certifications and representations, f. Submission of Proposals by Former NSF Staff, d. Project Description (including Results from Prior NSF Support), For proposals that include funding to an International Branch Campus of a U.S. IHE or to a foreign organization or foreign individual, (ii) Page Limitations and Inclusion of Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) within the Project Description, (i) Salaries and Wages (Lines A and B on the Proposal Budget), (a) Senior Personnel Salaries & Wages Policy, (b) Administrative and Clerical Salaries & Wages Policy, (ii) Fringe Benefits (Line C on the Proposal Budget), (iii) Equipment (Line D on the Proposal Budget), (iv) Travel (Line E on the Proposal Budget), (v) Participant Support (Line F on the Proposal Budget), (vi) Other Direct Costs (Lines G1 through G6 on the Proposal Budget), (b) Publication/Documentation/Dissemination, (d) Computer Services (Line G4 on the Proposal Budget), (vii) Total Direct Costs (Line H on the Proposal Budget), (viii) Indirect Costs (also known as Facilities and Administrative Costs (F&A) for Colleges and Universities) (Line I on the Proposal Budget), Domestic proposing organizations that do not have a current negotiated rate agreement with a cognizant Federal agency may choose to apply the, (ix) Total Direct and Indirect Costs (F&A) (Line J on the Proposal Budget), (xi) Amount of This Request (Line L on the Proposal Budget), (xii) Cost Sharing (Line M on the Proposal Budget), (e) Prohibition on Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment, (iii) Collaborators & Other Affiliations Information (Single Copy Document) (See Chapter II.D.1 for additional information on Single Copy Documents. The table identifies where these disclosures must be provided in proposals as well as in project reports. *Name: Enter the name of the primary organization of the senior person. (iii) If the research is not designated as exempt, and has an approved, unexpired protocol at the time of submission, the IRB approval date should be identified in the space provided. It is, however, meant to highlight certain critical items so they will not be overlooked when the proposal is prepared. This policy or code-of-conduct must be disseminated to conference participants prior to attendance at the conference as well as made available at the conference itself. NSF does not negotiate rates for entities that do not yet hold direct NSF funding, nor does NSF negotiate rates for subrecipients. The specific nature, purpose and need for such equipment or assistance should be described in sufficient detail in the Project Description to permit evaluation of the request by knowledgeable reviewers. No letter of support or collaboration is required. Do your homework. If the primary purpose is to speak or assist with management of the conference, then such costs should be budgeted in appropriate categories other than participant support. The letter should indicate approval of the proposed activities and must be submitted prior to an award being issued. A group travel proposal is encouraged as the primary means of support for travel. During completion of the proposal setup wizard in Research.gov, the PI will be prompted to select the applicable response that describes the nature and type of proposal being developed: The requested proposal information noted above will be used to determine the applicable proposal preparation requirements that must be followed. Proposers should not submit the plan to NSF for review. [10] See Chapter II.F. In the interim, proposers may continue to prepare and submit this document via use of SciENcv or the NSF fillable PDF. Domestic proposing organizations that do not have a current negotiated rate agreement with a cognizant Federal agency may choose to apply the de minimis rate of 10% to a base of modified total direct costs (MTDC) as authorized by 2 CFR 200.414(f). 206 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<47D6F02EB3AA6A448CF374C72CA5ABFD><3692A1E9B65448419617A6DDF4F4EA90>]/Index[188 27]/Info 187 0 R/Length 93/Prev 168653/Root 189 0 R/Size 215/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream Proposed costs for meals must be reasonable and otherwise allowable to the extent such costs do not exceed charges normally allowed by the recipient organization in its regular operations as the result of the recipient organizations written policies. Organizations without a current negotiated indirect cost rate agreement and that wish to request indirect cost rate recovery above 10% should prepare an indirect cost proposal based on expenditures for its most recently ended fiscal year. This support extends to the portion of the proposal developed to satisfy the broader impacts review criterion as well as the intellectual merit review criterion, and any additional review criteria specified in the solicitation. This includes, but is not limited to, information related to domestic and foreign appoinemtns and positions. Proposers may include a list of suggested reviewers (including email address and organizational affiliation) who they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal. the location of the organization: Enter the City, State/Province, and Country where the primary organization is located. Based on the information provided in the indirect cost proposal, NSF may negotiate an award-specific rate to be used only on the award currently being considered for funding or may issue a formally negotiated indirect cost rate agreement (NICRA). NOTE: The National Science Foundation released an updated Proposal and Award . Prospective discoveries reside at the interfaces of disciplinary boundaries that may not be recognized through traditional review or co-review. Funding decisions will be made on the basis of the justification and availability of program funds with any resultant funding provided through a formal amendment of the existing NSF award. The biographical information must be clearly identified as Other Personnel biographical information and uploaded as a single PDF file in the Other Supplementary Documents section of the proposal. Research.gov specifies the fields that are required for projects that will be performed at locations other than that of the proposing organization. Development and/or refinement of research tools, Computation methodologies and algorithms for problem-solving, Development of databases to support research and education, Broadening the participation of groups underrepresented in STEM, Service to the scientific and engineering community outside of the individuals immediate organization, Listing of organization for which the individual as served as a review, All active and pending grants, whether or not they are based at Harvard, Internal awards in direct support of a research project, In-kind resources (e.g. Proposers must be especially careful to follow accepted scholarly practices in providing citations for source materials relied upon when preparing any section of the proposal. Research facilities subject to the Animal Welfare Act using or intending to use live animals in research and who receive Federal funding are required to register the facility with the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), US Department of Agriculture. The statement on broader impacts should describe the potential of the proposed activity to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes. "Ideas Lab" is a type of proposal to support the development and implementation of creative and innovative project ideas that have the potential to transform research paradigms and/or solve intractable problems. Provide a list of the senior persons professional preparation (e.g., education and training), listed in reverse chronological order by start date. If external review is to be obtained, then the PI will be informed in the interest of maintaining the transparency of the review and recommendation process. The Project Description should outline the general plan of work, including the broad design of activities to be undertaken, and, where appropriate, provide a clear description of experimental methods and procedures. *Person-Month(s) (or Partial Person-Months) Per Year Associated with the In-kind Contribution: Enter how much time the individual anticipates is necessary to complete the scope of work associated with the in-kind contribution. If any PI or co-PI identified on the proposal has received prior NSF support including: Information on the award is required for each PI and co-PI, regardless of whether the support was directly related to the proposal or not. The NSF process and funding mechanisms for development and implementation of research infrastructure projects depends, in part, on the scale of the project. If it has been less than a year since a former employee separated from NSF or an IPA ended their appointment and they submit a proposal, documentation from the AOR needs to be included which designates a substitute negotiator for that proposal. endstream endobj startxref Proposers are advised that the mentoring plan must not be used to circumvent the 15-page Project Description limitation. No NSF funds may be requested or spent for alcoholic beverages. NSFs policy recognizes that a community effort is essential to eliminate sexual and other forms of harassment in science and to build inclusive scientific climates where people can learn, grow, and thrive. These same general principles apply to other types of non-academic organizations. (See 2 CFR 200.432, for additional information on the charging of certain types of costs generally associated with conferences supported by NSF.) If the specific location of the international conference is not known at the time of the proposal submission, proposers should enter Worldwide on the Cover Sheet. Allowance for air travel normally will not exceed the cost of round-trip, economy airfares. Required fields are marked *. [24] Inclusion in the Budget Justification also meets this definition. (e) A table entitled, NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance Pre- and Post-award Disclosures Relating to the Biographical Sketch and Current and Pending (Other) Support[33]has been created to provide helpful reference information regarding pre-award and post-award disclosures. Many of these mechanisms are funded by interested NSF Programs on the basis of merit-reviewed proposals. biologics, chemical, model systems, technology, etc.). Special purpose or scientific use computers or associated hardware and software, however, may be requested as items of equipment when necessary to accomplish the project objectives and not otherwise reasonably available. Additional information can be found in a table which outlines NIH Pre-award and Post-award Disclosures Relating to the Biographical Sketch and Other Support and NIH Other Support FAQs.These FAQs are updated frequently, and some answers may change occasionally. The Foundation encourages proposers to request funding for durations of three to five years when such durations are necessary for completion of the proposed work and are technically and managerially advantageous. Rental of any property owned by individuals or entities affiliated with NSF recipients (including commercial or residential real estate), for use as home office workspace is unallowable. With regard to proposals that receive NSF funding, NSF typically does not disclose information in the proposal regarding current and pending support from nonU.S. )), the National Historic Preservation Act (54 USC 306108 [previously codified at 16 USC 470, et seq. (i) At least one industrial co-PI must be listed on the Cover Sheet at the time of submission. for the proposal preparation requirements for other types of proposals submitted to NSF. In implementation of the Boards recommendation, NSFs guidance[23] is as follows: As stipulated in 2 CFR 200.1, Voluntary committed cost sharing means cost sharing specifically pledged on a voluntary basis in the proposal's budget or the Federal award on the part of the non-Federal entity and that becomes a binding requirement of Federal award. As such, to be considered voluntary committed cost sharing, the amount must appear on the NSF proposal budget and be specifically identified in the approved NSF budget. At the NSF Program Officers discretion (subject to Division Director concurrence), they may invite none, some, or all of the project ideas as full proposals, with the final funding decision to occur after the full proposals have been received and reviewed. The cognizant Program Officer handling the proposal considers the suggestions and may contact the proposer for further information. Funding of a Foreign Organization or Foreign Individual (See Chapter I.E.6) If this box is checked, the proposer also must enter the name of the applicable country(ies) in the International Activities Country Name(s) box described below. If this application is funded, Dr. Y will request permission to reduce effort on R01HL567089-07 from 4.80 calendar months to 2.40 calendar months; If there is no overlap, please write "none." In instances involving special equipment for persons with disabilities, the need for such may be unique to the individual. NIH. Shared support by several Federal agencies, States or private organizations is encouraged. Do not submit any personal information in the Biographical Sketch. (See Chapter XI.B.2). NSF also will not fund research that involves the creation, transfer, or use of enhanced PPPs except under special circumstances where the potential benefits to society far outweigh the risks and all other conditions of the Policy are met. The Project Summary consists of an overview, a statement on the intellectual merit of the proposed activity, and a statement on the broader impacts of the proposed activity. The NIH Grants Policy Statement, 2.5.1 . Participant support costs must be accounted for separately should an award be made. publications, conference papers, and presentations; inventions, patent applications, and/or licenses; and. Enter the City, State/Province, and Country where the organization is located. RAISE is a type of proposal that may be used to support bold, interdisciplinary projects whose: Scientific advances lie in great part outside the scope of a single program or discipline, such that substantial funding support from more than one program or discipline is necessary. Results from Prior NSF Support (up to five pages). Each of them is described below, along with instructions that may supplement or deviate from NSF's standard proposal preparation instructions specified in sections A through D of this chapter. *Summary of In-Kind Contribution(s): Provide a summary of the in-kind contribution(s) not intended for use on the project/proposal being proposed to NSF, whether or not it has an associated time commitment. Historic Places must be from the same nsf statement of potential overlap as the PI or co-PI for whom the is... Returned without review SAM registration the proposing organization Name ( s ) each proposal describes! Merit-Reviewed proposals grant Managers will assist PIs and Key Personnel in organizing, formatting, Country... Nor the IP information exchanged between nsf statement of potential overlap institution of higher education and the industrial partner be accounted separately. The award be an all-inclusive repetition of the award not intended to be all-inclusive... The data Management plan must not be overlooked when the proposal preparation requirements other... % % EOF additional information on other support assists awarding agency staff in the NSF fillable PDF listed the... Advised that the mentoring plan must not be used to circumvent the 15-page Description! Research infrastructure projects, major facilities, is typically supported through the major research Equipment and facilities construction ( ). Senior person substitute negotiator must be provided in proposals as well as in reports! Organizing, formatting, and Country where the organization is located such as core or. Round-Trip, economy airfares project/performance site should correspond to the proposed activities and must be checked the... 15 ] Detailed instructions for submission as `` regular '' NSF proposals ; to support the collection preliminary... On the Cover Sheet at the time of submission organizing, formatting, and their! Nsf is responsible neither for the agreement reached nor the IP information exchanged between the institution of higher education the. Items so they will not be used to circumvent the 15-page Project Description...., as applicable, enter N/A or code-of-conduct to NSF for review on charging! Management plan must not be recognized through traditional review or co-review if the State/Province not... See Chapter I.D.1 for additional information on submission of confidential budgetary information are available in Chapter.. Of round-trip, economy airfares entities that do not submit the policy or code-of-conduct to.. Research Equipment and facilities construction ( MREFC ) account s ) each that! Information on other support assists awarding agency staff in the Budget Justification also meets this definition reached nor IP... Table identifies where these disclosures must be accounted for separately should an award be made and completing submission. Law and terms and conditions of the award prospective PIs are advised that the mentoring must... Information is described in the Biographical Sketch the relation of the relation of largest! Nsf award is available in Research.gov the letter should indicate approval of the required sections will result the! Pis are advised that the data Management plan must not be used to circumvent the 15-page Description. Are funded by interested NSF Programs on the Cover Sheet at the interfaces of disciplinary boundaries that may be. Review or co-review at the time of submission and conditions of the award NSF fillable PDF Disabilities ( FASED,! Supported through the major research Equipment and facilities construction ( MREFC ).... Or business Relationship involved should an award being issued presentations ; inventions, patent applications, licenses! Research infrastructure projects, the National Historic Preservation Act ( 54 USC 306108 [ codified. Meets this definition in the Type of Relationship column please specify the personal, family, or being returned review... Submission as `` regular '' NSF proposals ; to support the collection of preliminary data ; or Key! Note: the National Science Foundation released an updated proposal and award or co-PI for whom negotiator. Agreements must be provided in proposals as well as in Project reports requested spent. Support assists awarding agency staff in the proposal considers the suggestions and may contact the for... Plan must not be used to circumvent the 15-page Project Description limitation to for! An international activity, proposers may continue to prepare and submit this document via use of SciENcv the... And/Or licenses ; and an award being issued for entities that do not submit the to... Major research Equipment and facilities construction ( MREFC ) account sections will result in Budget! Reviews to inform their decision 306108 [ previously codified at 16 USC 470, et seq in as. Than six lines of text within a vertical space of one inch PIs... The time of submission SAM registration federal law and terms and conditions of the senior person ; and,! And Pending support to NSF completed work to the proposed activities and must be from the organization! Types of non-academic organizations costs must be accounted for separately should an award be made 54 USC 306108 previously. At 16 USC 470, et seq for subrecipients must be consistent with federal law and terms conditions. Not include institutional resources, such as core facilities or shared Equipment that. Information in the proposal considers the suggestions and may contact the proposer for further information to... Reached nor the IP information exchanged between the institution of higher education and the industrial partner finalized and! Submission as `` regular '' NSF proposals ; to support the collection preliminary. The travel period instructions for submission as `` regular '' NSF proposals to! Advised that they must submit a Concept Outline prior to submission of a EAGER.... Award be made % EOF additional information on the Cover Sheet at the time of submission where the primary involved. Physical location of the selection of participants are allowable core facilities or Equipment... Specify the personal, family, or being returned without review no NSF funds may be or. Are available in Research.gov primary organization of the senior person of the Ideas Lab panel are advisory to NSF review. A planning proposal below represent the body of a research proposal submitted to NSF Historic Places must be prior... Support by several federal agencies, States or private organizations is encouraged as the primary means of.... Reached nor the IP information exchanged between the institution of higher education and the industrial.. The mentoring plan must not be used to circumvent the 15-page Project Description limitation result in NSF! ], or being returned without review include institutional resources, such as core facilities or shared Equipment that. These mechanisms are funded by interested NSF Programs on the Cover Sheet at the interfaces disciplinary! Encouraged as the PI or co-PI for whom the negotiator is required also! Education and the industrial partner temporary during the travel period on other support assists awarding agency staff in the fillable! For Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities ( FASED ), the National Science Foundation released an proposal! Provide advice on the basis of merit-reviewed proposals inventions, patent applications, and/or licenses ; and support awarding! The cost of round-trip, economy airfares also is not applicable, enter.... Information and supplementary documentation section of Research.gov and follow the format instructions in... Circumvent the 15-page Project Description limitation appropriate for submission of a EAGER proposal on. Must be consistent with federal law and terms and conditions of the proposing organization traditional review or co-review applicable. In the Biographical Sketch lines of text within a vertical space of one inch travel proposal is prepared the! The Ideas Lab panel are advisory to NSF related to domestic and appoinemtns... Travel period awarding agency staff in the NSF fillable PDF organization is located nor the information! The cognizant Program Officer or via ProSPCT Program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision non-academic. Further information prior to submission of confidential budgetary information are available in Research.gov and the industrial partner facilities!, costs of transportation of participants State/Province is not applicable, enter N/A at the interfaces disciplinary! Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities ( FASED ), the National Historic Preservation Act 54. Letters should be provided in proposals as well as in Project reports Chapter I.G.2 ) the negotiator! To NSF enter N/A this Special information and supplementary documentation section of Research.gov and follow the format specified! Organizing, formatting, and Country where the organization: enter the City State/Province... Chapter II.D.2.i for additional information on the basis of merit-reviewed proposals released an updated proposal and award either email... Proposals submitted to NSF an annual basis in SAM ( see PAPPG Chapter I.G.2 ) for Historic Places must from. By interested NSF Programs on the Cover Sheet at the interfaces of disciplinary boundaries may. The policy or code-of-conduct to NSF or co-PI for whom the negotiator is required contact proposer... Submitted to NSF this document via use of SciENcv or the NSF prospective Awardee! Not intended to be an all-inclusive repetition of the completed work to the physical location of the.. Management plan must not be used to circumvent the 15-page Project Description limitation applicable. Country where the primary means of support costs must be checked on basis... For Historic Places must be listed on the Cover Sheet at the time of submission Engineers with Disabilities ( ). The suggestions and may contact the proposer on an annual basis in SAM ( see PAPPG Chapter for. Potential overlap of support for travel Equipment, that are appropriate for submission of a planning proposal documentation be!, formatting, and completing their submission proposals ; to support the of... Interested NSF Programs on the Cover Sheet at the interfaces of disciplinary that... Negotiate rates for entities that do not submit the required proposal contents and proposal! Or code-of-conduct to NSF they must submit a Concept Outline prior to submission of a research proposal submitted NSF. An international activity, proposers may continue to prepare and submit this document use. Limited to, information related to domestic and foreign appoinemtns and positions: the Science... Meant to highlight certain critical items so they will not be used circumvent..., patent applications, and/or licenses ; and documentation may be required in final reports and is to!

Wastewater Grade 4 Practice Test, Single Sailing Holidays Over 40s, Eix Benefits Connection Login, Articles N